Tuesday, July 15, 2008

are you kidding me?

seriously, how is this guy even a viable candidate.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

he is a candidate becaust the same people who voted for him-voted for "w" TWICE!!!

9:03 PM

Blogger David said...

uffda. we've been sold down the river.

10:11 PM

Blogger Melanie said...

I wouldn't know enough to give an informed answer to that question. One would have to assume that birth control is not covered by most companies while viagra is. I think bc is covered by mine, I'm not sure about viagra. I don't think the government should necessarily be the determiner of what's covered. I can't imagine that being a real pressing issue in this election, and I'd like to see what was edited out as that was an obviously edited video.

Anyway, I looked this up.


So, he probably should have asked her if it was fair that men pay $10 per pill with insurance for viagra, while women only far less per pill without it. It's silly, I know. I'm only saying this to say that it was kind of a question out of left field. One thing might be rather fair - women risk strokes on the pill (my co-worker had a pill induced stroke), men risk heart attacks with Viagra.

I do wish someone else was running, though, that being said. You and I wouldn't agree about Obama for sure. Maybe I should just not discuss politics? LOL

1:00 AM

Blogger rachel! said...

haha, what is that. seriously.

7:18 PM

Blogger Kristen said...

http://sendables.jibjab.com/ you may have seen it already but I feel like you might get a kick out of the "election 2008" cartoon.

7:31 PM

Anonymous air rick said...

cuz viagra is for making babies, and birth control for killing them. Seriously birth control is making sex lose its sacredness.

8:12 PM

Blogger David said...

arrgghh. i will hold my tongue.

11:37 PM


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home